Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Fear is Fear is Fear....

You may have noticed that we are in the midst of the presidential primary season here in the US. McCain has wrapped up the Republican nomination, but Obama and Clinton are still slugging it out. Both Obama and Clinton have disavowed Bush and his fear mongering politics, but Clinton has been playing the same fear card that has disguised itself as economics. Fear is fear, whether it is a fear of terrorism or a fear of losing your job and not being able to provide for your family. There is also the fear of change and it is this fear that underlies all the others.

What is fear? Fear represents a lack of trust that the future will bring contentment. Fear does not reside in the present moment, or the NOW if you prefer. When you are fearful you are fearful of something that does not exist in the moment that you are being fearful. I know what I have, but I don’t know what the future will bring if I change course. This is fear of change. I have been trying to attach words to the feelings I get when listening to Barack Obama. He encourages me to be self-responsible. He invites me to participate in the process of government. This is juxtaposed to McCain and Clinton, who tell me what they will do for me. The change that Obama represents to me, and I suspect to the millions that support his candidacy, is not government as usual, but rather, government of and by the people. Although I have always voted, I never really felt as though my vote counted for much, because other than exercising my right to vote I was never invited to empower myself. Obama invites us to self-empowerment much as Kennedy did when he said in his inaugural address, “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.” I get the sense that Obama is saying, “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for yourself.”

Self-empowerment is scary business. “Who will take care of me?” “I can’t fully take care of myself.” “What if I lose my Job?” “Who will feed my kids?” “I’ll lose everything.” “If we don’t close our borders the terrorists will get in.” There is a great deal of victim mentality in these statements, but more than that there is fear. Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew about the dragon of fear when he said, “There is nothing to fear, but fear itself.” He had an intuitive sense that fear immobilizes. How do we immobilize ourselves in the present moment? By being fearful of the moment that has not yet arrived. Where do we create the moment that has not yet arrived? In the present moment. Where are we in the moment when our attention is on something that has not happened yet? Well, we sure aren’t in the only moment that creates the future, which is the one you are currently experiencing.

So, what does fear have to do with this election and the three candidates, McCain, Clinton and Obama? In getting at this it is important to remember that the objective (outer) world is symbolic of our subjective (inner) literal world. McCain represents the status quo and is the representative of those who fear change the most, but Clinton is not far behind. She is feminine gender, but for the most part expresses a masculine persona. She wants government to do what she believes we are incapable of doing ourselves. She represents the mother that wants to fix, fix, fix her children, but cannot see her children fixing themselves. Obama is physically symbolic of change. Yes, he is of male gender, but expresses a decidedly intuitive and therefore feminine orientation. (I refer you back to my posts on Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus.) Symbolically his genetic makeup represents the world as a whole and therefore the downfall of tribalism on both a local and global scale.

All this is not to say that Obama is not ready to lead our country, for he is. All this is to say that we can change business as usual in Washington. All it takes is a little courage and a little faith in that inner voice that you may hear that says, “Trust this man for the future is now.”
Bill Marshall

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Ouch! That Hurt

I don’t know how you feel about it – although I have my suspicions – but I hated being a victim. Whether I was a victim of an accident, or someone’s harsh words, or an angry wasp, it never felt good. Something just didn’t seem right about it. For some reason I believed part of my early religious education that said we were endowed with free will. It didn’t say we were endowed with free will some of the time and it didn’t say we were endowed with free will only until such time that God decided to go into ‘mysterious ways’ mode. No, it said we were endowed with free will. I don’t know why that stood out for me above all the other hoopla that goes along with a religious education, but it did. It eventually led to my safari into a land called awareness. I’m still there and discovering that it’s a damn big continent.

OK, back to being a victim….or not. It certainly appears that we are victims. It’s hard to argue with the families of those killed during 911 that their loved ones chose to disengage from this world. This is why many of us who pursue the concepts and the experience of creating your own reality rarely engage in such conversations with anyone other than those already familiar with the concepts. Part of the problem lies in our definitions. Thought does not choose. The thinker of the thought chooses. Descartes and his, “I think, therefore I am,” conjoined thought with self. Three hundred years later Jean-Paul Sartre realized “The consciousness that says, ‘I am,’ is not the consciousness that thinks.” That is to say that the awareness that realizes you are thinking is not part of thinking. It is the real “I” that thinking is merely an aspect of. Thought translates, and when it translates correctly it appears that thought chooses. How do you get thought to translate correctly more often? Pay attention to what you do and quit blaming what is outside you for your emotional and physical state.

Let’s just play a game. For one day suspend your current understanding of reality and ‘pretend’ that you are creating it all; the good, the bad and the ugly. At the same time you are going to suspend your judgments of good and bad because if you are creating it all you are going to be tempted to blame yourself and therefore become a victim of yourself. A victim is still a victim whether the result of outside forces or internal forces. You’re probably saying, “what difference does it make if I create being stung by a wasp or I continue to see it as I am the victim of a wasp stinging me? It still hurts and it still sucks.” The difference is this: you learn nothing from a bee sting except to avoid bees if you see yourself as a victim of the bee. You become self-aware when you realize you create it all and that it all has meaning. I’ll tell you this from direct experience. When you get the communication of a wasp sting, the sting looses its sting.

The amazing thing about self-awareness is that you begin to create consciously. As you pay more and more attention to self (the chooser, not the thoughts) then thought is fed more information, which allows it to interpret correctly more often. What this means is that we no longer need to create those things we used to create just to get our attention. In other words, you experience fewer accidents and bee stings. The more self awareness grows the fewer conflicts we’ll experience and when we do experience conflict we know that we have chosen it. There is a huge psychological difference between being the victim of conflict and being the chooser of conflict. The world becomes an objective reflection of an inner subjective state instead of a pre-existing milieu in which we bounce around like a pin ball. But, hey. Maybe it has been your choice to be bounced around and so if you enjoy the world acting like the flippers of a pinball machine, then bounce away. But, if you’ve received more than a few bruises and you’d like to try something different, then try this. You are the flippers, you are the machine and you are reflected in all that you perceive.

You also draw everything into your experience. There are no accidents. You only think there are. It makes sense that if you create it all then you draw it all, and if you draw it all to you then it seems logical that you spend a little time figuring out what you drew to yourself is trying to tell you. In a nutshell you draw specific individuals and interactions to you in order to experience what those individuals and interactions represent. In doing this you offer yourself information concerning your automatic responses. What are automatic responses? They are belief driven responses that you hold so absolutely that you that you cannot choose to act differently. An example of an automatic response might be slapping someone in the face that just called you an asshole. There are other choices. If I am accepting of myself I will not allow another’s perception of me to alter that. I can reconfigure that projected energy or I can just have it bounce off of me. If I am paying attention to me and realizing that I drew that individual to me for a reason then I need not react automatically in defense. I also need not argue against his perception (or hers). I don’t need to take his or her perception and allow it to create a conflicted state of mind.

What have I done in the above example? In the case where I am aware, I presented myself with a series of beliefs that were operative at the moment of the experience. I believe I have choice in every moment and that I have invited this experience as an exercise in choice and acceptance. In that moment I was called an asshole I was not only accepting of me, but I was also accepting of my reflection (the person that
called me an asshole). What am I showing myself in the scenario where I slap the person in the face? My automatic response is based on the belief that he or she was the cause of my reaction. I was also telling myself in that moment that I was neither accepting of myself or the other. Of course if I continue to believe in accidents, victimhood, and being the effect of a cause then the event becomes nothing more than a conflict producing experience that I will create over and over in a thousand different ways. We have free will, but we are only now coming into an awareness of how to exercise it consciously. Free will is not directed by thought. Free will is directed by what Sartre recognized as the thinker of the thoughts. It is through an expanding awareness that every single moment of our lives involves choice. As long as we act automatically we are not free. Choice is freedom.

Bill Marshall

Thursday, February 14, 2008

I Second That Emotion.....

If we all really pay attention we would find that a major component of our human experience is emotion. Virtually everything we do generates an emotion. Sit in a comfortable chair and we feel relaxed. Jump in a hot shower and we feel comforted. Hugging a puppy makes us feel good. Being unexpectedly hugged by someone who has just run ten miles makes us feel gross. Your boyfriend forgets your birthday and you feel sad and maybe mad. Name the experience and an emotion will be attached to it, even if it is no more noticeable than a whisper. If emotion is such a large part of our human existence it would follow that maybe it is important to understand what it really is. Let me start out by saying what emotion is not. Emotion is not a reaction. Your sadness that your husband forgot your birthday is not a reaction to his forgetting your birthday even though it appears so. He is not the cause of your emotion. He is the Trigger to release what you are subjectively experiencing in that moment.

So, if emotion is not a reaction, as in an effect of a cause, then what is it? Drum roll please… EMOTION IS A COMMUNICATION. Did I hear someone say, Huh? Emotion is a two part communication that is telling you something about you in that moment. The first part is the signal, or what we used to call the emotion itself. The signal is the feeling; sad, mad, glad, jealous, frustration, joy, depression, hate, love……. These are all signals alerting us to the communication that we have just received. The feeling is NOT the communication, just as the phone ringing is not the message. Signals/feelings are alerting devices, and in this case the feeling alerts us to the message we have just received. The message offers thought (our translator) precise information regarding what we have generated subjectively (inwardly) in that moment that the signal appeared. Let me back up a bit.

We, as humans, incorporate both a subjective and an objective awareness. They work in harmony, which means one does NOT follow the other, just as emotion is not a reaction. Subjective awareness represents our inner world, which is literal, and the objective awareness represents our outer world, which is a symbolic representation of the subjective. Objective imagery is just as symbolic as our dream imagery. OK. Let’s say in one particular moment the subjective awareness is experiencing a non-acceptance of self. This is quite literal. “I do not like myself very much in this moment.” You can’t get much clearer than that. In exactly the same moment that I am subjectively experiencing a non-acceptance of myself the objective awareness is projecting outwardly through perception a ‘real world’ scenario to represent that subjective non-acceptance of self. You may fail at folding an origami properly and judge yourself. “I suck at this.” Your husband might break wind at the dinner table and you judge him. Remember, to judge another is a reflection of your judgment of self. The objective awareness can create an infinite number of outer manifestations to represent the same literal subjective state.

If we but only pay attention, emotion can be a precise communication, identifying what belief is operative in the moment that you are actually experiencing the emotion. The feeling, again, is not the communication, but rather the signal that we are receiving a communication from our subjective awareness. Why is it important to know the belief that is operative in the moment? Because our beliefs influence perception and our perception creates our objective reality. The signal or feeling is there simply to get our attention. So, if embarrassment is the knock on the door or the ring of the phone, then what might the communication be? Let’s pick up the phone and answer the door and look at an example.

You’re at a formal sit-down dinner and you drop a hunk of gravy laden pork on your white chiffon dress. You get the signal (embarrassment) that you have received a communication from your subjective awareness. The signal is supposed to snap your attention back onto yourself. The communication comes by way of the objective awareness, which created the experience of the dropped pork. Embarrassment is NOT the communication. In the moment that the pork dropped on your dress leaving a big brown stain your subjective awareness was feeling inadequate, clumsy, stupid and judgmental about Self. Why? Our beliefs will tell us why. What are the beliefs that create the feeling of embarrassment? There are probably many and they may differ for each of us, but let’s look at a few. One might be that dropping food on yourself is the sign of a slob. Another might be that people think poorly of slobs. Here, one belief influences another. Another belief might be that drooping food on yourself is indicative of a careless person. Another might be that only children drop food on themselves. When you automatically feel embarrassment then you have turned these beliefs into absolutes. They have become your truths even though they are not true. And when we don’t recognize our individual truths we eliminate choice. We act automatically. Acting automatically is a clear sign that you have turned a belief into an absolute.

The point I wish to make in all this is that if we pay attention to what we do in the moment, that moment carries a treasure trove of information about ourselves and what beliefs we are feeding into the film projector called perception. If you continue to believe that emotion is a reaction then you will continue to give our interpreter, which is thought, inadequate information. All that you experience is a
reflection of you. All that is needed is the opening of our eyes. We draw others to us to trigger what is in US so that we may view it outwardly. So the next time your hubby forgets your birthday, thank him for being a willing player in a communication you have configured for your own enlightenment. Or, you can choose to continue in your old ways, blame him for not caring about you, and learn nothing about yourself. Choice is freedom.
Bill Marshall

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Doctor, Doctor Give Me The News.....

It has taken me quite some time to square away in my head how to reconcile my beliefs about modern medicine with my understanding of reality creation. Both have evolved over time. Since this is a belief driven reality in that beliefs heavily influence perception, which actually creates our reality, I started out with the faulty notion, “It’s ONLY a belief.” I also erroneously deduced that the operative belief was the one I THOUGHT I believed, rather than the one that was expressed in the moment. An example here might be helpful. Let’s say I want to lose weight and I say to myself through THOUGHT that I believe losing weight will be easy. This is the belief I think that I believe. So I begin the process and no matter what I do I lose very little weight and suffer during the entire weight loss program. The expressed belief is that losing weight is difficult and painful and so that is the belief that is operative, and not the thought-belief that losing weight is easy. I should probably mention that all of us hold ALL beliefs, but typically express only those that align with our exploration in this focus and our value fulfillment. You hold the Hindu belief (not through thought) that Brahma bulls are sacred, but it will be highly unlikely that you will express that belief. What you do is the expression of the belief, which is why it is so important to pay attention to what you do.

So, what does all this have to do with how we address our health? I have a belief that I create my health and my illness, not only consciously, but unconsciously as well. Having said that, I also believe that I hold all beliefs, including my old beliefs about health. What were my old beliefs? Disease is caused by an inability of my immune system to ward off microscopic invaders and that some physical anomalies are the result of a compromise of a particular physical system. In short, I was a victim. If I caught a cold I’d take vitamin C and eat chicken soup. My allergies I’d treat with anti-allergy meds. When I came onto this reality creation stuff in the 80’s I started with the erroneous understanding that if I understood the belief I held I wouldn’t have to believe it anymore. NOPE. This is where Elizabeth Kubler Ross erred. She died of lung cancer and until nearly the end had refused to give up smoking because she believed the ill effects of smoking were ONLY beliefs. She didn’t get it that what she was expressing within her body was the belief that smoking kills. THE EXPRESSED BELIEF IS REALITY. It is not JUST a belief. That is not to say that Elizabeth did not create her lung cancer. She did, but she did it through the operative belief that smoking kills. She also did not die before her time. Her death was her choice as was the manner in which she died. But, they were all belief driven. Remember, choice is not driven by thought. It is only when thought interprets correctly that it APPEARS that thought is choosing.

So, I have this belief that if I create all of my reality then I don’t have to buy into all of the mass beliefs about health. For the most part I don’t adhere to the mass beliefs about health, but here is the ‘catch’. The mass beliefs about health hold tremendous energy and are not bad beliefs. It is only the belief system of duplicity that says some beliefs are good and some beliefs are bad. I have, throughout my life, created a body that is rarely sick. I did have bad seasonal allergies and regular kidney stones, but was able to uncreate both without medication. I haven’t had an allergy ‘attack’ or a kidney stone in nearly 20 years, just about the time I drew the reality creation concepts into my life. Mostly I choose not to participate within the current medical model, but this is not an absolute, for absolutes deny choice. In understanding that beliefs drive perception and perception creates reality it is important to realize that we are not eliminating beliefs.

So, even when I choose to take a pill it is still me that creates the healing. I am simply utilizing the pill as a focal point to do it. The reason I don’t typically participate in the current medical model is because of a belief I have that the current model instills beliefs that destroy trust in our body’s ability to heal itself. I’m talking about our immune system that has responded to our beliefs that it is not up to the task without pharmaceutical help. But my beliefs in the matter of health are no better than anyone else’s, even the person that pops forty pills a day. It is their choice and it is just as valid a choice for them as mine is for me. What I try to do is change my subjective awareness in a way that it sends messages of trust to my body consciousness. Trust is an absence of doubt that my body, in the absence of limiting and thwarting beliefs, knows perfectly well how to rev along on all eight cylinders.
Bill Marshall

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Re-meh meh remember member

Here’s something that we have all experienced in one form or another. About two weeks ago, maybe more, the child of a dear friend of mine was attacked by several Rottweilers. He’s a tough and brave little dude, but was badly chewed up. I told my wife about it (my memory of this telling is quite clear) and, as expected, she was aghast; asking me all kinds of questions about the incident. Two days later I gave her an update and was informed that she had no idea the little guy had been attacked. She prides herself on her memory. I knew exactly what was happening and it wasn’t that she was experiencing the insidious onset of Alzheimer’s. If this had happened years ago she and I would have butted heads; me arguing that I did tell her and she arguing that I never told her; me thinking she forgot and she thinking I’m losing my mind. This is how most of us continue to treat such incidents. You’re watching a movie with your partner and she reminisces about the first time you saw that movie together. You’re thinking, I never saw that movie and nothing about it is familiar. What is she talking about?

OK. You know you have experienced this. How you deal with it involves your modern Cartesian mind that says one of you forgot, and that is because you believe there is one and only one THE REALITY. It becomes a memory thing because we have no other pot to put the experience in. In my example my wife and I were interactive when I was telling her about the dog attack. She was shocked and fired off a million questions, some of which I answered and some I couldn’t. It wasn’t that I mentioned the attack while she was knitting and got back an ‘uh huh.’ That’s something I’m more likely to do (not the knitting part – not that there’s anything wrong with that!!). But I’m lucky (there really isn’t such a thing as luck). I have a different pot to put these kinds of anomalies in. Some of you already know about the pot, but most of you have no framework in which to put such experiences and so they all become memory lapses/brain farts. It’s going to take a bit of explaining to describe the pot I put this action into.

The name of my pot is Attention. Attention is defined as what I am doing, not necessarily what I am thinking. Attention is action and can be multi-tasked. You are your attention. That’s sort of a mouthful, so to understand attention I think it requires an understanding of how we manipulate energy. We are all energy and we interact with each other’s energy, but not always with each other’s attention. It is important to understand that attention can move to thought, but attention is not thought. Usually, when you are interactive with another individual you are interactive with their attention. Your perception configures their body image pretty much in the manner in which they project their body image to you. And most of the time their attention is interactive with you, and visa versa. In the case of my wife and I, I configured her body image and the conversation, but I was not interactive with her attention. ATTENTION IS NOT THOUGHT. She had no memory of our conversation because her attention was elsewhere. The conversation took place in my reality, but not in hers. The movie experience took place in the wife’s reality, but not in her husbands because she was configuring his energy, but his attention was elsewhere. ATTENTION IS NOT THOUGHT.

My wife did not forget our conversation. There is not a single reality that we all perceive differently. We all create our own reality and usually (but not always) pretty much like everyone else does. If we didn’t our individual worlds would be far more strange than Alice’s rabbit hole. So memory and attention are two different things. Memory may be a brain function, definitely a time function, and a function of our beliefs, while attention is a consciousness function. We are consciousness; not, consciousness is part of who we are. When we try to memorize a string of 40 digits that function is heavily influenced by our beliefs. Those with photographic memories have no limiting beliefs that their brains are incapable of doing such things. And it is not the belief we believe we believe, it is the belief that is expressed. I can’t just say I believe I can memorize 40 digits and whallah, I do it. The belief that is expressed is that I can only memorize 10 digits and that only those with photographic memories can do 40. The expressed belief is also that only special brains can do such things. If I memorized 40 digits then the expressed belief would be that I can memorize 40 digits.


But this is all different than not remembering something because your attention was not present. Remember, your attention is you. Now, you may have left energy available for my perception to create you and our interaction, but you really weren’t involved. There was nothing for you to remember, just as my conversation with my wife never took place in her reality. It only took place in mine. There is no THE REALITY that we all perceive differently. There are six billion realities and sometimes what we interact with is the energy without the attention.

Now, there also is the time thingy. It’s called simultaneous time and it says that the you that you remember from five years ago exists now. So my wife shifts her attention to two weeks ago and cannot find the experience. This is because the experience never took place in her reality. This is tough to absorb, I know, but our physicists are gradually coming to this conclusion about the simultaneity of time. So here’s some food for thought. If all time is simultaneous, is memory nothing more than shifting our attention to the time in which the experience existed? This is what I think is happening rather than all of our memories being stored in our brains and requiring some retrieval system to unearth them. Who or what is the retriever? I believe we as consciousness is the retriever and we retrieve all of our memories by shifting our attention to the time the event took place rather than pulling them from some neuron in the brain. I can see some of my more rational friends (you know who you are) rolling their eyes and thinking, “Billy has gone off the deep end.” I haven’t but that is beside the point. With my point of view I no longer get into fights/arguments when someone seemingly forgets an event we mutually participated in. I also no longer blame someone for having a faulty memory or losing their mind and I also let go of my need to be right. My wife and I are both right. The conversation never took place in her reality, but it did in mine.

Bill Marshall

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Personal Responsibility

I don’t know of a single person who, at one time or another, hasn’t felt responsible for another human being. In particular we feel responsible for our children, but we also feel responsible for the feelings our actions may create in others. I want to talk about personal responsibility, but I am going to do it by rephrasing part of an Elias transcript (session 593) and adding some of my own thoughts.

The issue of personal responsibility involves turning your attention away from yourself and onto the creations/experiences of someone else, usually someone you
think needs fixing. In turning your attention onto them you assume responsibility for their reality. We camouflage this action of personal responsibility by calling it caring, compassion, sympathy, helpfulness, guidance and love. We, as good individuals, wish to offer help and support to those we feel are in need. What we are really saying is that the individual that we are feeling responsible toward is not capable of creating their reality as well as I can create it for him. In other words, they make bad choices. Most of us in our actions of personal responsibility for others feel that our fixing a part of someone else’s reality will make their lives better and happier.

Now, we may say to ourselves: “I create my own reality and others create their reality,” but the underlying belief is quite different, and it is our actions that express the underlying belief. Put another way, what we do will reveal the operative belief. What we really believe is that we create our reality some of the time and others create their reality some of the time, but we know what is best for them. It works the other way as well. We believe that others can create our reality at times without our permission. This is the expression of victim.

It is important that we understand what assuming personal responsibility for others really is and how often we do it. We do it all the time. Assuming personal responsibility for others dooms us to failure. We fail because it is impossible for us to create anyone’s reality other than our own. Not only can we not create another’s reality, we cannot even influence another’s reality without their agreement. That agreement can be either subjective (what we call unconscious) or objective (what we call conscious), but without that agreement we will have no influence. If you lock your child in his room to keep him from hitting the streets to buy drugs and he stays in his room because he can’t get out, it is not you who has kept him in his room. It is him. He has subjectively agreed with you and has objectively created his own locked door. If he wasn’t in subjective agreement he would objectively be out on the streets. It looks like you created his reality, but
without his subjective agreement he’d be snorting a line of coke. What this means is that our influence is based upon the choice of another to receive our influence. This is not done by thought although at times it seems as though thought has decided to agree. If you’ve read some of my posts you understand that thought interprets and does not create.

All of this represents the power of choice, and choice is never denied. This is what we call free will and it is an innate element of each of us. Now, since underlying this reality is the reality of non-separation then each time we express personal responsibility for another we are simultaneously discounting ourselves. When we discount another in their ability to create their own reality we are discounting ourselves.
The rest of this post are some thoughts I have on what I just interpreted Elias as saying. Not taking personal responsibility for someone else does not mean we subjugate our natural inclination toward compassion. Compassion is defined as understanding without judgment. It is acceptance through understanding that individuals create perfectly within their intent and value fulfillment. Understanding without judgment facilitates the expression of love. So how can we be compassionate without taking personal responsibility for the person we are feeling compassionate toward; be it husband, wife, child, friend or any of the billions of the down-and-outers? We do it by following our preferences and our individual guidelines without holding any expectations as to the outcome. For instance, it is part of my guidelines to provide financial support to my children until they are through with college. I don’t expect their gratitude, although I seem to get it. I don’t expect them to do anything with their education other than what they desire to do with it. If they ask my advice I give it, but without any expectation that they will follow my advice. I am not responsible for their feelings, just as they are not responsible for mine. We may trigger each other’s feelings, but we are not responsible for them. To think otherwise would make each of us victims of each other.

Expectations regarding outcomes often block the outcome we desire. Remember how you felt when you gave a gift and didn’t receive a thank you? When you give a buck to a panhandler do you hope he will spend it wisely? If so, then this is an expectation. I give because it makes me feel good. This is my preference. There are no strings attached to my compassion. I require nothing for it. Worry and guilt are not a part of compassion, but can be a large part of taking personal responsibility for someone else. So, be compassionate without expectations, but eliminate your tendency to take personal responsibility for others. Follow your own guideline and preferences, while holding no one else to the ones you follow. I think you will be quite surprised at the outcome of such a change in your behavior.
Bill Marshall

Friday, January 25, 2008

Coffee

This appeared in the news on 1/21/2008. “Drinking a couple cups of coffee a day has long been considered safe during pregnancy, but a new study finds that even this modest amount of coffee could double a woman’s risk of miscarriage.”

So, what choices do we have when confronted with this kind of information? If we don’t drink coffee it doesn’t impact us at all, but if you are a woman, pregnant and a coffee fanatic then this kind of info probably gave you the shakes. It seems to me that science has made virtually everything hazardous to our health and when everything is hazardous we all become the infamous Seinfeld bubble boy, or we decide that the science can’t be right. We live in an age where cause-and-effect is king, and have therefore taken on as truth all that science tells us. It becomes an absolute, and as an absolute we don’t question it. This is why the pregnant coffee-lover trembles at such headlines. This is why we wash our hands forty-two times and day and this is why we allow fingers and probes to explore our asses and vaginas. We allow this because of our beliefs, which we hold as absolutes, or as our scientists tell us, facts. Put more simply, we believe that facts are truths.

It is a fact for most of us that we can be attacked by bacteria and by viruses. It is a fact that too much of this or too little of that can affect our bodies in myriad ways. It is a fact that if you drink Drano your plumbing system is going to be in for a rough ride. These facts, or beliefs-held-in-the-absolute as I like to refer to them, are not illusions. Down a shot glass full of Drano and you’ll know real quick. It is our belief in these facts that either keep us away from dangerous situations, like drinking Drano, or make us victims to others, like viruses or bacteria or mutating cells. But, you may have noticed if you’ve been keeping up with my blog, that I’m a pretty big proponent of the I’m-not-a victim thing.

When we catch a cold most of us see ourselves as the victim of the cold virus. When I catch a cold I see it as my creation. We all get colds, but I’ll bet you a cup of coffee (pregnant women excluded) that mine will last half as long as yours as long as you see yourself as a victim of the cold virus. My last cold lasted 2 days and was very mild. I think I created it so that I could show myself how quickly I could get rid of it. See, that is the difference between being a victim of one’s reality and creating one’s reality. There is information about me in every experience I create. For me life has become a game and the game includes all of the emotions we currently experience. And I must say, that it feels great not blaming someone or something for both the good things and the bad things that I experience. Notice that I didn’t say, ‘happens to me.’ When you realize that you create it all then nothing HAPPENS to you. Everything becomes choice. Then it becomes important to understand how you choose, because thought does not choose. But before any of this can take place a remake of our notions regarding who we are has to begin.

If you believe that facts are immutable cosmic truths then I advise all pregnant women who love coffee to stop drinking it if you want to reduce your risk of miscarriage. If you believe that facts are beliefs held as absolutes then you have a choice if you are pregnant and love coffee. Identify the beliefs, accept them (there’s going to be many more than one) and then choose. Remember, acceptance means no judgment. Many who read my blog already understand choice, but many others don’t. Those others argue that we create some things, but not all things. I understand why
you hold this position, because I held it once myself. But, it was all the questions that arose while holding that position that led me to where I am now. Choice and a self-created reality works for me and I understand quite well that I am part of a distinctly small minority in my thinking. Maybe I write these posts to gain some company, but I mainly write them because I like to. I hope you like them as well. And remember, you can like something without agreeing with it.
Bill Marshall

Thursday, January 10, 2008

The Chooser

Choice is a big word that carries some big weight. What bigger freedom is there than the freedom to choose? But what is it, exactly, that chooses. Historically we have given the honor of choosing to the conscious mind. That is to say that if we did not consciously choose what happens to us then what happened to us was not through choice. The thinking goes that if I stub my toe it was certainly not through choice. I did not say to myself before stubbing my toe: “Hey, I’m going to stub my toe on the leg of that chair.” Who in their right mind would consciously stub their toe? Who in their right mind would choose cancer? Rationally speaking it makes complete sense that no one would choose cancer. No one would choose a dysfunctional relationship. No one would choose any of the myriad forms of unpleasantness that seems to befall all of us. But our understanding of choice is based on a couple of things; the most important of which is our definition of consciousness. How we understand the mechanism of choice is also based on our understanding of ourselves; who we are and where have we come from. Throw in our current understanding of reality and it is no wonder that we think we choose some of the things in our lives, but certainly not all of the things. We create some of our reality, but certainly not all of it.

One of the definitions of being conscious is to be capable of thought, will, or perception. Thought is defined as the act, process, or power of thinking. Call me skeptical, but this sure seems to put consciousness in a tiny little box, just as tiny as the box we put ourselves in. Certainly our entry into this world was not by choice. Right? We didn’t choose our parents. Right? Who we are was the result of chance; the random joining of just one of millions of sperm cells with an egg. Certainly the egg and the sperm are not conscious, although it does almost seem as if the egg consciously chooses the one sperm it allows into its hallowed inner sanctum, thereby producing our physical form. So who are we and where do we come from? Are we the result of a coincidental joining of
one sperm and one egg. Science says we are. To what purpose are we thrown randomly into the world of form and matter? Could it be that our greatest misconception is our understanding of consciousness itself? Is consciousness only contained within the gray matter of the human brain, or is the human brain merely our conduit through which consciousness expresses itself in the human body? In my view the brain is much like our TV sets. The images are not produced in the set. The TV merely configures the images sent from elsewhere.

And what about reality? Is your perception of reality more right than mine? Do our dreams pierce
a veil that keeps other realities at bay while we are awake? Or, are our dreams nothing more than mind residue as our scientists like to tell us. Science loves to break down and separate and put things into categories. We have an ego, a conscious mind and a rather large unconscious mind. But since we believe that consciousness is created by matter and that it exists within matter we have placed it in a far back seat on the bus. You can’t drive the bus from the back seat. So, when it comes to choice there is no way we can conceive of choice except volitionally through the conscious mind. When we hold this understanding of consciousness and choice we can be nothing but victims whenever thought does not choose.

The way we understand consciousness and choice makes it impossible for us to move into total self-responsibility and acceptance of what it is we do create. Our understanding prevents us from trusting that what we do create in each moment is part of a process that gets us to what we want. The process may not be what we expect, but through trusting whatever the process brings we will manifest what it is we want. I had set a goal of running the Marine Corp Marathon (26.2 miles) in October 2007 with my three buddies. My training was going well (according to expectations) until July, when I tore my right calf muscle. I was reduced to walking and using an elliptical trainer. I’d run some but if I pushed things my calf would tear again. This part was not according to expectation and I began to doubt that I would be able to run the marathon. After all, who could run a marathon by training on an elliptical? I knew I chose the calf tear (yes, I’m in my right mind), but I had moved out of the trust mode because this process of a torn calf and elliptical training had never led me to a successful marathon before.

But then I got it. I created a challenge for myself and I was not trusting the method of accomplishing the goal. From that point on (about a month before the marathon) I trusted the process – torn calf, elliptical and all – and knew I would finish the marathon. There was no doubt. I was not a victim of poor biomechanics, or bad luck or even myself. I chose everything that happened on my way to finishing the marathon. Yes, I chose it, but not by way of thought. Thought is not the chooser. Thought interprets that which is chosen. Consciousness is the who, what and where of who each of us is, and it ain’t stuck in the brain. You are the chooser whether you like it or not.
Once you own that you become free. Freedom is a very nice feeling.

Bill Marshall

Friday, November 02, 2007

Knowing, Trust and Doubt

I have recently come to an awareness of the power of knowing, trust and doubt. I have come to understand them more as feelings than words and definitions, which are symbolic of the feelings they evoke. Knowing is different than my understanding that 2+2=4, or that my cat’s name is Magic. True knowing requires no THOUGHT. My reaching for my cup of coffee that sits before me, bringing it to my lips and taking a sip is knowing. I projected a desire of wanting a sip of coffee and just did it. I didn’t doubt that I could reach for it and do it. I didn’t think that I had to move my arm toward the cup, move the cup to my lips and then sip from the cup. I knew without thought, just as I breathe without thought and walk without thought. Walking, however, is a wee bit different in that I project a destination, a goal so-to speak. I don’t doubt that I will walk to where I want to go. I trust in the process, but I don’t think about the trust, for the knowing is already in place.

How does knowing, trust and doubt relate to creating what we want? Throughout most of our day we are in knowing mode. We just do and expect the realization of the doing. When we are in knowing mode the only time thought comes into play is when we translate into words our desire to do something. “I’m going to the grocery store,” is thought’s translation of a desire. Going to the store is knowing and the process of getting there involves trust. When I trust I do not question the process of how I get to the grocery store. In this example the feeling of doubt does not enter the picture. So, again, most of our day is filled with knowing. It is when we project a desire that does not include knowing that we find ourselves struggling.

Let me give you a personal example. About eight months ago my buddies and I decided to run the Marine Corp Marathon (26.2 mi.) in Washington, D.C. on October 28th. When the goal was first set I was filled with knowing that I would complete the distance with my buddies, as I had run many marathons over the years. For those of you that have run marathons you may be aware that the training involved is more rigorous than the marathon itself, as it takes several months to work up to the 26.2 mile distance. The goal was set and the process began. At first everything was going according to plan, until June when I tore my calf muscle on my right leg. This opened the floodgates to doubt. My thinking went wild because I couldn’t train the way I THOUGHT I had to train for a marathon. It turned out that my knowing was conditional upon the process. As long as the process went according to my expectations my knowing held up. The process, by the way, is what I DO and not what I think, as it turns out.

Doubt lead to a lack of trust in the process, and when these two messages come knocking at your door, knowing hides under the bed. As long as I did not trust my process of getting to the finish line of the marathon I would experience doubt. I’ve been working with this create-your-own-reality stuff for twenty years now and one of the things I know about myself is that I love challenges. What I didn’t realize was how much I was not paying attention to and trusting in the process of getting to my projected desire. I was fine with trust as long as the process went according to my expectations. Those powerful beliefs that I held in the absolute went unrecognized by me until about a month before the marathon when I drew (law of attraction) to me information about knowing, trust and doubt. The process involves the now and it is only in the now that we can create our future.

I finally decided to ACCEPT (not judge) the process, calf tears and all, and began to trust the process again, but without expectations. This led to many beliefs I had regarding what it takes to run a marathon. When I identified the expressed (what I do) beliefs I found that I could choose differently. This all took practice, for it was a different way of addressing my own reality. I got back to the knowing by trusting that no matter what I created within the process the projection of my desire would manifest itself. Ultimately what mattered was the projected desire and not how I got to the manifestation of the desire. How I got there was the process, which required trust and keeping expectations at bay. Had it not been for my understanding of the concepts that go into creating one’s own reality I would not have attempted to run the marathon with the level of training I had. When I toed the line on race day I knew I would finish because I had trusted the process that got me there.

We can manifest any desire by simply projecting the desire and accepting everything that happen in between the projection and its manifestation in our lives. If you want to draw a romantic relationship into your life simply project the desire and get on with your life. Your life is the process. Trust it. You don’t need to join a social club, unless you want to. You don’t need to hit the clubs, unless you want to. But, no matter what process you undertake let go of the expectations that that particular process will get you what you want. You may be choosing a different way to draw a romantic relationship into your life. Let it unfold without judgment.
Bill Marshall

Friday, May 04, 2007

Virginia Tech


For those of us that have studied Seth, Elias, Kris, Abraham, et.al., what I am about to say will make sense. For those of you that are not familiar with what these folks/ghosts have to say you may find a part of you, deep inside, that resonates with what follows. Your minds may rebel, for your thinking is heavily influenced by your beliefs, but if you pay close attention you may find a burgeoning nod of agreement somewhere within your being. Mass events, such as the one at Virginia Tech, leave us with questions that are often bigger than the event itself. Many times, if we allow it, we are left with our current beliefs more entrenched than before. Beliefs such as ‘man is inherently tainted’, ‘God works in mysterious ways’, ‘no place is safe’ and ‘Satan has a foothold in the earthly realm’ are but a few. There are two beliefs that I will address here. The first is that we are victims and the second is that something or someone is the cause of our plight. We call it blame and it is tightly linked to our sense of victimization.

By now most of us have seen the video of Cho blaming everyone and every thing for his miserable state of mind. He takes no responsibility for his own life. Blame is an aspect of our larger belief in cause and effect. If you forget my birthday you are the cause of the effect, which is my sadness. If you steal something from me you are the cause of the effect, which is my anger. Cho believes that we are the cause of his effect, which was deep depression, anger and psychosis. We believe that Cho is the cause of our effect, which is grief, sadness and anger. Our belief in cause and effect makes victims out of all of us and creates our deeply entrenched penchant for blaming. It keeps us locked in victimhood and throws us deeply into a defensive mode. We ask; how do we protect ourselves and our children from such madmen? The question itself further deepens our belief that the world is unsafe and that we can at any moment become a victim of it, and so we continue to create what we believe. Is there any way to understand the tragedy at Virginia Tech in a way that can move us away from our rock solid beliefs that we hold as truth and keeps us on the hamster wheel of victimhood and blame? I believe there is.

Mass events are created not to portray man as hapless creatures, no more in control of their lives than a feather tossed by a turbulent sea. They are created to confront us with our beliefs, for how can we accept a belief if we do not recognize it as a belief. Our beliefs represent our truths and often appear as facts. Our beliefs are the films that feed through the projector lens of our perception. Choose a different film and the projector projects a different scene. Looking at mass events or individual events in this manner takes God off our shitlist and reinstates free will to its rightful place of prominence. By noticing What we do rather than Why we do it we can unearth the beliefs that drive our perception and therefore create our reality. God does not operate in mysterious ways. We just don’t know how to drive our own cars. Maybe it’s time we learned how.

So, Cho blames us and we blame him. Sunnis blame Shiites and Shiites blame Sunnis. Arabs blame Jews and Jews blame Arabs. The Middle East blames the West and the West blames the Middle East. The Republicans blame the Democrats and the Democrats blame the Republicans. Sally blames Harry and Harry blames Sally and we are all victims of each other. Or so we believe, and so it is. Does anyone see any history in this type of thinking; in this belief of ours in victimhood, blame, and cause and effect? Does anyone remember what Gandhi created with non-violence? Cho is our creation as much as we are his. I’m going to share with you a portion of chapter 21 of a novel I wrote called The Redemption of Stanley Kronicki Jr. (not yet published).

Let me set the scene. It takes place on death row at the infamous Walls prison in Huntsville, Texas. John Tyson is soon to be executed for the murder of 16 year old Julie Baggins, committed by shotgun blast as he was robbing a convenience store. Hal Berwick is a reporter for the Jersey Journal newspaper and is there to talk to Tyson about his son, Stanley Kronicki Jr. Stanley was horrendously abused by John Tyson and his mother before the state took him away and put him up for adoption. Now, as an adult, Stanley has drifted into his own form of madness and is in the process of being redeemed by his friends. Berwick is at the prison to get Tyson’s story in the hopes that it can in some way help Stanley. The scene is about responsibility for one’s actions, not just Tyson’s, but ours as well. Here we go:

Berwick had to readjust his eyes. The man sitting across from him was barely recognizable as a human being. Berwick’s mind shot back to 1958. He was thirteen and watching an episode of the Twilight Zone, called The Sin Eater. Over time, and one by one, the people of a remote village entered the hut of the sin eater, who would take their sins and their guilt into his own body. Years passed and throughout the episode Rod Serling cleverly kept the sin eater hidden. The more sins he ate the more he moaned and the more terrible his voice became, while the villagers stayed eternally young and healthy. Then at the last moment of the last scene the camera showed Hal Berwick what fifty years of sin eating had wrought on the sin eater. He now sat directly across from Berwick in a small cage just outside Huntsville, Texas.

Time seemed to have sped-up the ageing process for this sin eater, for he looked twenty years older than his actual age. He sat stoically, almost defiantly in his animal cage, his skin blending perfectly with the white of his prison uniform. He had the gray eyes of his son that sat widely apart on a head that looked like a butternut squash set on end. At some point in his troubled life, probably long ago, he had tattooed a blood-red tear drop at the corner of his right eye. It was faded now like the man who bore it. His lips were as thin as razors and scarred as though he had been afflicted with some strange disease that required repeated surgical intervention. Hal Berwick saw the gap in his teeth and the scar on his lip just above it. His forehead looked like it had been plowed by a garden tiller, so deep were its furrows, and his face could have held a cup of water in its lines and creases. Overall, his face gave the impression of an etch-a-sketch randomly scribbled on by a three-year old. Tyson’s hand, yellowed from a lifetime of chain smoking Pal Mall straights, trembled as he hoisted the phone to his ear. It was missing a BB-sized chunk from the lobe.

“I ain’t got much time and I’m tired of livin’,” Tyson said. His voice was sandy and weak. “So let’s git a move on. Take your pictures first.”

Hal Berwick cocked his camera and captured the wizened image of John Tyson from several angles. One of them would find its way to a cabin wall in the New Jersey woods. He sat down on the hard chair and hooked-up his recorder to the phone.

“Now, tell me about my son,” the sin eater commanded. “I treated him worse than my daddy treated me. He tell you that?”

Hal Berwick nodded.

“How’d he turn out?”

They had agreed to give John Tyson something positive to carry to his grave, so Berwick lied.

“That’s good,” the old man sighed. “That’s real good. I was ascared that they might of taken him from his mama and me too late. The woman drunk herself to death. Couldn’t hold her likker like her ole’ man.”

A look of soul searing pain skirted across the moonscape of the sin eater’s face as a foggy memory surfaced then sunk again. “If I had to do it over, I would’ve killed the baby as it was being born, rather than let him live through what I did to ‘im.”

Tyson lifted his eyes to meet the reporter’s. “You tell him his daddy’s sorry.”

“I’ll tell him, Mr. Tyson.”

“You tell ‘im it was nothin’ personal. It was all me. I would’ve done the same to any kid. You know, I remember a time, when the same was bein’ done to me by my daddy, that I swore to the God that had forsaked me that I’d never do the same. Damn! I’m glad this livin’ business is almost over.”

He stopped for a moment as though something had gotten his attention, and went searching in his mind like a man feeling for a hair in his mouth. He knew something was there calling for him to notice it, but he needed to search around a bit to find it. A light went on in some far-off place in John Tyson’s mind and he found the hair.

“I tried to stop druggin’ once. It was right after they took my boy away. But they had no programs like they got now. The urge was too powerful to control without help. After that I just said, ‘fuck it.’ I went hell bent for leather after that. Straight down a dark hole to hell, which is probably where I’m headin’ in a pretty short while.”

Tyson’s mind darted off in another direction like a steel ball in a pinball machine after hitting a bumper. “You know I’m called the geezer here,” he said. “Usually they come here early; nineteen or twenty. Hell, we got a few seventeen. Some of ‘em didn’t even know there was a death penalty, not that it would’ve mattered. I was forty when I was sent to the Walls, then moved here two years ago. They only use the Walls for their killin’ now. They move me there tomorrow. I put you on my list of one. You gonna watch me get killed, Mr. reporter man?”

“Stanley asked me to,” Berwick replied. He knew it was his role to play in the redemption.

“The little girl’s folks will be there. It ain’t gonna be an easy thing to do. For me, I mean. Stupid thing I did, killin’ that girl.” His mind hit a bumper and skirted off to another part of the table.

“I’m glad they got rid of that God damned ‘lectric chair. The bug juice is better than the chair, though, what with all that twitchin’ and the stench of burnt skin an all. The bug juice is a real human way to kill a man.”

“You mean ‘humane’?”

“God damn it!” John Tyson screamed. “I got me twenty-four hours left and you’re givin’ me a fuckin’ grammar lesson. In two days I’ll be planted in Joe Byrd cemetery like a dog’s bone with nothin’ on my marker ‘cept my prison number, and you’re correctin’ how I talk. If’n I said human, I meant human.”

“I’m sorry Mr. Tyson. It’s a bad habit. My mother used to do it to me and I hated it. Strange how we do the things we hate to do.”

“Damn straight.” The pinball passed between the flippers and dropped into the bowels of the machine. John Tyson yawned. “I’m tired now, and want to rest before they take me to G wing. I want to see a friendly face when I die. Don’t let me down now, and tell my boy I always loved him, even if it was in my own twisted way.”

The sin eater hung-up the phone and signaled for CO Tilley. Hal Berwick disconnected the recorder’s earpiece from the phone and watched the old man hobble out of the room and then out of sight.


John Tyson couldn’t figure the purpose of it, them checking on him every fifteen minutes. It pissed him off. He’d been in the death watch cell for three hours and the CO’s notes had him on the toilet twelve times. Tyson thought it was a pretty good joke, and quite clever of him. He was given the privilege of dying in the clothes of his choice and had asked for a gray CO uniform, but was refused. He stuck with basic white. He wanted to die in something familiar. Tilley heard of his request and wished he was back on J wing for one more day, or even ten more minutes. Ten minutes would be all he’d need.

Tyson heard several footsteps approach and knew his time was drawing to a close. A CO opened his cell and four gray clad guards entered his tight little room. One held his death warrant in his hand, while the other three stood him up and fastened a large leather belt around his waist and hitched it under his crotch then cuffed his hands to it. They left his legs unshackled so as not to slow down his march out of Ellis.

The gate separating the Ellis population from death row was closed and the hall, usually ripe with activity, was quiet and empty. Tyson, with his phalanx of CO’s, marched to the prison infirmary, not for a final check of his health, but because it has a back door to a road. The infirmary was empty. At 4:20 PM the back door opens and John Tyson leaves the only real home he has ever known for the Walls in downtown Huntsville, twenty miles away.


The death chamber is the most attractive room John Tyson has been in for twelve years. It is slightly larger than his cell, but not by much, and the curtains in front of the viewing window give it a homey touch. In the center of the room stands the killing table, slightly longer than his bunk, and covered with a soft mattress so that he’ll be comfortable when he dies. Very human, the sin eater thought. Two arm-rests jut out from the table’s sides at an eighty degree angle, so that the whole thing looks a little too much like a cross. There are six leather straps running from the foot of the death bed up to where the arms jut out at the strange eighty degree angle, and each arm rest of the cross has its own strap. A two-way mirror is built into the wall to the left of the killing table so that John Tyson can see his body from the waist down, but cannot see through to his executioners. He had hoped to be able to look them in the eye.

Four guards, two on each side of the table are undoing the tie-down straps as John Tyson is brought toward the table. It was crowded and the mix of body odor and after-shave was beginning to make the geezer sick. Funny, he thought, how a bad smell would upset him more than his impending execution. He realized how tired he was, so very tired.

His last bed was now unencumbered with the leather straps and the pure white of the sheets made him squint as his pupils puckered and shrunk. Two guards moved him to the table and laid him down. John Tyson did not struggle as did so many others. His body embraced the softness of the thin mattress. One by one the straps were secured, a little tighter than need be, he thought. Maybe the guards were nervous, or maybe they thought he’d try to escape. But escape to where. He was so tired.

A somber man in a white lab coat entered the execution chamber with the “works,” as John Tyson thought of them. The man prepared his left arm with an alcohol rub as if preventing infection really mattered at this point. There wasn’t much fat on John Tyson’s body so the somber man’s tapping brought out a vein in no time. He reached for a number 27 IV needle and told the sin eater to prepare for a little prick.

It was a lifelong habit of his to whistle whenever he was afraid, and so he began a tune as the executioner pricked a fat juicy vein. He looked at John Tyson as recognition of the tune registered on his mind. Sympathy for the Devil was not one of his favorites, in fact he hated it. The song was, however, the darling of death row. The sin eater had the kind of mind where the melody stuck like iron shavings to a magnet, but the lyrics sifted through like beach sand through a wide mesh strainer. The low pitched growling whistle assaulted the sanctity of the ritual, and as the somber man connected the ‘works’ to the saline drip, John Tyson sang the only lyrics to the song he knew. All the cops are criminals, and all the sinners saints, followed him out of the room and greeted the warden, whose entrance ended the music.

The warden, a well muscled man in his mid-forties, faced John Tyson and read the legal document that shook in his trembling hand. The curtain was drawn, allowing the witnesses unimpeded sight of the ritual. His words echoed through a small loudspeaker in the witness gallery, the quality of which reminded Hal Berwick of the Bayonne Drive-in. As he listened to the last words John Tyson would hear from another human being, the reporter wondered what comfort the Baggins could draw from such a macabre scene. Having no children of his own he could only speculate about the special kind of love parents describe when talking about their children. The Baggins looked to be about John Tyson’s age, but clearly life had been better to them, although Berwick was certain they would have exchanged their lives for his just to have been able to embrace their daughter one last time before she died. Lorna Baggins was dressed in a black pant-suit, not out of respect for her daughter’s murderer, but as a symbol of abiding grief caused by her loss. She sat stoically in her chair and repeatedly dabbed her running eyes with a soaked tissue, waiting for the act she knew would take her pain away.

The warden finished reading the death warrant then looked at the clock. It was 11:57 PM and Harry Gleason was a punctual man. If the state of Texas decreed death to be administered at exactly 12:00 AM then, by God, he would see to it that it wouldn’t happen at 11:59 or 12:01. Following the rules was what got him to where he was today. Harry Gleason formally asked, according to the ritual rules, for John Tyson’s last words.

John Tyson was never much of a thinking man, choosing rather to spit out whatever was on his mind the instant it appeared. He wanted to say something and hoped the words would surface, as they always had, seemingly from somewhere else. The words came slowly, but they came.

“If ever there was a man more ready to die,” he said. “I ain’t met him.”

He locked eyes with Lorna Baggins. “I’m sorry I took your baby from you and her daddy, and I hope my dyin’ will bring you a measure of peace.”

The sin eater paused for a moment then directed his attention to the remaining members of the witness chamber, three reporters, the prosecutor in his case and Hal Berwick.

“I’m willin’ and I am so very ready to give up my life, not that I have any choice in the matter, but I aint’ the only one responsible for killin’ that innocent little girl. You all got a little piece of the action on that one, even if you ain’t willin’ to look at it. It’s easy for you all to say how nice the world would be if only my neighbor would change, but the world don’t grow a John Tyson in a vacuum. So, the next time you pass-by a man sleepin’ in a cardboard box, or a mother slappin’ her misbehavin’ child in a grocery store aisle, and you do nothin’ about it, I want you to think about ole’ John Tyson. In my uneducated opinion, any place that could grow a man like me ain’t completely innocent of the crimes he commits.”

He paused and looked at his IV. “That’s all I got to say on the matter.”

His head turned slowly to Harry Gleason. “I’m ready warden. Let’s get it done with. I’m real tired.” John Tyson took up the whistling and Hal Berwick sang the words to himself.

Please allow me to introduce myself,
I’m a man of wealth and taste,
I’ve been around for a long, long year,
stole many a man’s soul and faith.
I was around when Jesus Christ
had his moment of doubt and pain.
Made damn sure that Pilot
washed his hands and sealed his fate.
Pleased to meet you,
Hope you guessed my name............

The somber man caught the nod from the warden and released the Sodium Pentothal into the Tygon line, not enough to put John Tyson into a deep sleep, but enough so that he couldn’t respond to what was coming next. It was enough to stop the whistling. Next the executioner walked to his leather case and retrieved a syringe of Mercurium Bromide, sufficient in quantity to take the breath away from a charging Rhino, and injected it into the ten feet of tubing. It slithered snake-like down the tube looking for a meal and found it in John Tyson’s chest. His lungs struggled to breathe, while his brain tried desperately to continue the job it had done faithfully for fifty-three years. An asthmatic wheeze leaked through his scarred lips and his mind battled against the horror of drowning in a sea of oxygen. Next, the executioner retrieved another syringe, similar in appearance to the first two, but marked KCL in bold red letters. It was a liquid expertly designed by a chemical engineer to grip the heart in a steel fist and shut it down. John Tyson’s heart tried heroically to overcome the effects of the powerful invader, but it, too, fell prey to the clear liquid’s dark strength. His heart slowed to the beat of a death dirge while the Sodium Pentothal kept him still, and easier to watch. It was, after all, a human way to do a killing.

I shouted out “who killed the Kennedys?”
When after all, it was you and me.
Pleased to meet you,
Hope you guessed my name.......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, there you have it. We never know each other’s stories, but we can acknowledge them with a smile for everyone, a kind hello and with a projected energy that says, I know you and I appreciate your story. We need to begin creating a world where none of us feel isolated and alone to such a degree they go psychotic and take thirty-two lives. We need not blame ourselves for the world each of us has created, but rather waken to an awareness of what it is we create and what it is trying to tell each of us. The telling will be different for you than it is for me, for we each have our own story and each story intersects every other.
Bill

Sunday, April 15, 2007

The Unkempt Teenager: A Dream


One of the things that Elias talks about is exposure; the opening of oneself and one’s energy. Exposure requires acceptance of all aspects of Self; acceptance meaning non-judgment. About a week ago a friend from the blueflash web site emailed me stating that he had dreamed about me the night before. I had been thinking recently about re-reading my old dream log; an impulse that I had not acted upon. I emailed my response to him then went downstairs and dragged out my dusty dream log.

From 1992 until 1998 I was in the throes of intense dream recall. I had already read all of Seth and in an attempt to link Seth’s information to what had gone before I began an intensive study of CG Jung, Joseph Campbell, The Tao Te Ching and all things Eastern, Houston Smith and the study of religion, etc. I must have read hundreds of books. I tell you this by way of background and where I was psychologically and spiritually at the time. I am going to share a dream I had on October 5, 1993 and exactly how I interpreted it at the time I had it. The interpretation is heavily Jungian, but laced with my understanding of the Seth material. Also, by way of background, you should know who Tyler is. He is my oldest son and at the time of the dream he was nineteen years old. When he was ten his mother and I divorced. Tyler is exceptionally bright and physically gifted and yet he barely made it through highschool due to alcohol and drug problems. I love him, have always accepted him and in many ways have seen a reflection of myself in him. With that said, here is the dream exactly as I wrote it down the morning after having it.

I was atop a mountain with Tyler. At the top was a small cave and in it was an unkempt teenager in black leather, long greasy hair, and dirty teeth. I was intimidated by him and noticed a carving in the cave. He said he carved it and that it was easy. He took out a small, but very sharp pen knife with his greasy hands and began carving what looked like a large shinny horse chestnut about five feet high. He again mentioned how easy it was and began making cuts on the chestnut, exposing the white meat underneath the protective brown shell. He offered me the knife so that I could try, but I refused, being afraid of him. There seemed to be two of him, one further back in the cave. The first one asked if I had change for a dollar. I think he was going to wash his clothes in a Laundromat. I gave him three quarters, two dimes and a nickel, but he wanted four quarters and asked Tyler for the other quarter. He then asked who gets the two dimes and a nickel and I told him to give it to Tyler.

That’s the dream and this is how I worked it, exactly as written at the time. I would work the dream differently now, but then I am different now. The associations I had with the dream symbols that resonated the most with me are in bold.
Associations:
Mountain: center – majestic – power – strength – sturdy – central mountain as in Black Elk Speaks – obstacle to overcome.

Tyler: love – problem – pain – hurt – anger – my own perceived inadequacies – my perceived failure as a parent – guilt – fear.

Small Cave: dark – scary – shelter – the unknown – primitive –a place that harbors dangerous animals – the unconscious (maybe not, because the cave is small.)

Unkempt Teenager: Unfinished – not properly trained or brought up – emotional problems – repressed – potentially dangerous – much room for improvement – in need of some love and rehabilitation.

Carving Sculpture: art – work – beauty – takes time creativity – patience – a process.

Sharp Pen Knife: has many uses – versatile – potentially dangerous, but useful – cuts and makes one bleed – I seem to be afraid of the knife in the hands of the teenager.

Horse Chestnut: seed – the potentiality for growth – food – future chestnut tree is contained in the seed, but the conditions must be right for the tree to grow.


Dollar: money – something to pay out – something you are given in return for work – wholeness – buys things – needed for material things - green – paper.

Laundromat: inconvenient, but a place where you can get your things clean – to wash – time consuming – dirty laundry – clean laundry.

3 Quarters, two dimes and a nickel: the fourth quarter of the quarternio (a Jungian term signifying wholeness) is not whole – unbalanced – unequal – unsymmetrical.

4 Quarters: symmetry – the whole is separated into four equal parts – the Quarternio.

Dynamics (of the Symbols):
Mountain: My central self – there is a part of me that is immovable, solid and unshakable, and stands above or as an anchor for all the rest. What is that part of me? Could it be my belief in the unity of all things? Could it be my central core, who I am? The most anchored part of my life right now is my belief in God and my oneness with God.

Tyler: I think guilt is primary here and because of it I experience the anger, the fear and the pain that I see in Tyler. Immaturity also in not taking responsibility for my actions or owning my feelings. Tyler may represent my own inner adolescent although I still think it’s guilt because there’s another symbol in the dream, the unkempt teenager, that fills this role.

Small Cave: That part of my unconscious that I’m afraid of. Not the whole unconscious, but a small part of it that I’m afraid to look at. What part is that? Maybe it’s fear itself. Maybe it’s my fear of truly revealing myself and how I feel, because I don’t trust those I love to accept me. It’s the part of me that I don’t want to look at.

Unkempt teenager: My own undeveloped, untutored adolescent may be that part of my unconscious that I’m afraid to look at. It’s obvious that this person needs some work, however. He doesn’t seem to know how to clean himself. He may be the part of me that holds back the truth; that acts as a teenager sexually, i.e. immaturely. He will remain this way unless I get him or give him some help. Fear of being scolded and likes to do whatever pleases him without regard for others.

Carving, Sculpture: A piece of work, in this case, that is in the process of being completed. That part of me that I’m currently working on. My spiritual side. My intuitive side. My feeling side. It’s odd that the unkempt teenager is the one doing the sculpting. Maybe these aspects of myself can’t come to completion until I bring the unkempt teenager in me into the process. I must acknowledge him.

Sharp Pen Knife: Something that can be used for good or bad in myself. Without training and/or discipline the knife can just as easily cut and make me bleed as it can create a work of art. The knife represents a tool I must learn to use in creating this aspect of myself. What is that Tool? Could it be listening without judgment?

Horse Chestnut: There is a fully formed being within myself that is waiting to be created. It’s possible that this inner adolescent can only be brought to completion, i.e., adulthood, by working on the adolescent in myself. Strong connection between my future growth and the inner adolescent and his energy, which seems to frighten me.

Dollar: The unkempt teenager doesn’t just demand four quarters. He asks for change for a dollar – a fair exchange. The unkempt teenager has the wholenes